Difference between revisions of "Memory dumps"
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
In this case the pages should have 12 pages in it, i.e. be 48K in size. Then the first 4 pages (16k, the first pagemap entry) would be read from image and put at address 0x1000000 thus occupying space up to the <code>0x1000000 + 4 * 4096 = 0x1004000</code> address. The last 8 pages (32k, the 2nd pagemap entry) would be read and put at the 0xCF000000 address. | In this case the pages should have 12 pages in it, i.e. be 48K in size. Then the first 4 pages (16k, the first pagemap entry) would be read from image and put at address 0x1000000 thus occupying space up to the <code>0x1000000 + 4 * 4096 = 0x1004000</code> address. The last 8 pages (32k, the 2nd pagemap entry) would be read and put at the 0xCF000000 address. | ||
+ | == Stacked images == | ||
+ | |||
+ | When [[incremental dumps]] are performed, for every iteration a <code>parent</code> symlink is created, and images become dependent on their respective parent(s). | ||
+ | |||
+ | There appears the 3rd field in the pagemap, called <code>in_parent</code>. It is a boolean flag, when set, means the respective data for the given pagemap is available from a parent image. While searching for data in parent, the same algorithm is used -- first the pagemap is resolved, then the data is found in pages. For parent images, the data (either complete or partial) can also be found in ''its'' parent images. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Naturally, the bottom image (the one with no parent link) must have no <code>in_parent</code> bits set. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Example === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Consider we have a pagemap from the previous example with <code>in_parent</code> bit set for one entry: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | { 0x1000000, 4, in_parent } | ||
+ | { 0xCF000000, 8 } | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this case, the pages image would be only 32k in size, since the first 4 pages are to be found in the parent. Thus the parent pagemap image should container one or more pagemaps covering the <code>0x1000000 ... 0x1004000</code> area, for example, like this | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | { 0x1000000, 2 } | ||
+ | { 0x1002000, 2, in_parent } | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | This, in turn, means that the first 2 pages from this range are available from the parent pages image file, and the last 2 should be looked up deeper, i.e. in the grand-parent pagemaps. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Deduplication == | ||
+ | |||
+ | See [[Memory images deduplication]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See also == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Memory dumping and restoring]] | ||
+ | * [[Images]] | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Memory]] | [[Category:Memory]] | ||
[[Category:Images]] | [[Category:Images]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Editor help needed]] |
Latest revision as of 12:54, 13 July 2017
This page describes the way memory is stored in the image files.
Overview[edit]
Process mappings are stored in mm.img images. But that info is only about the virtual memory areas. The data sitting inside those areas is all stored in pairs of files described below.
The memory dumps contain the contents of individual pages (4k) and the information about at which address in the virtual memory the data in question should be. Those images are not connected to the VMA list in mm.img at all, just the addresses matching makes things get into proper locations.
What gets into memory dumps is
- Present pages from anonymous private mappings
- Present pages from anonymous shared mappings
- Private (copied) pages from file private mappings
Images structure[edit]
Memory dumps are stored into two images.
- Pagemap
- This is the list of entries each of which is a pair -- where in the memory the data should go and which amount of pages it includes.
- Pages
- This is the plain set of 4k entries -- each one is a full page with data.
Example[edit]
Let's imagine we have pagemap contain two entries
{ 0x1000000, 4 } { 0xCF000000, 8 }
In this case the pages should have 12 pages in it, i.e. be 48K in size. Then the first 4 pages (16k, the first pagemap entry) would be read from image and put at address 0x1000000 thus occupying space up to the 0x1000000 + 4 * 4096 = 0x1004000
address. The last 8 pages (32k, the 2nd pagemap entry) would be read and put at the 0xCF000000 address.
Stacked images[edit]
When incremental dumps are performed, for every iteration a parent
symlink is created, and images become dependent on their respective parent(s).
There appears the 3rd field in the pagemap, called in_parent
. It is a boolean flag, when set, means the respective data for the given pagemap is available from a parent image. While searching for data in parent, the same algorithm is used -- first the pagemap is resolved, then the data is found in pages. For parent images, the data (either complete or partial) can also be found in its parent images.
Naturally, the bottom image (the one with no parent link) must have no in_parent
bits set.
Example[edit]
Consider we have a pagemap from the previous example with in_parent
bit set for one entry:
{ 0x1000000, 4, in_parent } { 0xCF000000, 8 }
In this case, the pages image would be only 32k in size, since the first 4 pages are to be found in the parent. Thus the parent pagemap image should container one or more pagemaps covering the 0x1000000 ... 0x1004000
area, for example, like this
{ 0x1000000, 2 } { 0x1002000, 2, in_parent }
This, in turn, means that the first 2 pages from this range are available from the parent pages image file, and the last 2 should be looked up deeper, i.e. in the grand-parent pagemaps.
Deduplication[edit]
See Memory images deduplication.