| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| | So after <code>open()</code> (or some other, see below) system call there will be this chain in the memory | | So after <code>open()</code> (or some other, see below) system call there will be this chain in the memory |
| | | | |
| − | [[File:Dumping_files-001.svg|thumb|center]] | + | [[File:Dumping_files-001.svg|thumb|upright=2|center]] |
| | | | |
| | The File object can be referenced by more than on FDT, e.g. when a task calls <code>fork()</code> the child one gets new FDT, but it references the same Files as the parent does, i.e. Files become shared objects. | | The File object can be referenced by more than on FDT, e.g. when a task calls <code>fork()</code> the child one gets new FDT, but it references the same Files as the parent does, i.e. Files become shared objects. |
| | + | |
| | + | [[File:Dumping_files-002.svg|thumb|upright=3|center]] |
| | | | |
| | The Inode object is also interesting. First of all, remember that in Linux file descriptors can be obtained not only by the <code>open()</code> system call, but also by <code>pipe()</code> and <code>socket()</code> and a bunch of Linux-specific <code>epoll_create</code>, <code>signalfd</code> and others. So when serving ''this'' Linux would anyway create the mentioned above chain of File-Dentry-Inode objects, but the Inode one will be different for different calls. And CRIU knows this all and acts respectively :) | | The Inode object is also interesting. First of all, remember that in Linux file descriptors can be obtained not only by the <code>open()</code> system call, but also by <code>pipe()</code> and <code>socket()</code> and a bunch of Linux-specific <code>epoll_create</code>, <code>signalfd</code> and others. So when serving ''this'' Linux would anyway create the mentioned above chain of File-Dentry-Inode objects, but the Inode one will be different for different calls. And CRIU knows this all and acts respectively :) |
| Line 37: |
Line 39: |
| | === Files themselves === | | === Files themselves === |
| | | | |
| − | Fore the sake of simplicity CRIU doesn't introduce separate states for Files, Dentries and Inodes leaving it to the kernel. Instead each this triplet is treated as one object and for every Inode type (file, pipe, socket, etc.) separate image is introduced. Thus CRIU has
| + | For the sake of simplicity, CRIU doesn't introduce separate states for Files, Dentries and Inodes, leaving it to the kernel. Instead, each triplet is treated as one object and for every Inode type (file, pipe, socket, etc.) separate image is introduced. Thus CRIU has |
| | | | |
| | * reg-files.img for regular files, that are created by open() call | | * reg-files.img for regular files, that are created by open() call |
| Line 46: |
Line 48: |
| | * etc. | | * etc. |
| | | | |
| − | In each of this files info about File and Inode of respective file is preserved. Dentry information is effectively stored there for regular files only -- the file's ''path''. | + | A full list of image files generated by CRIU is available in [[Images]]. |
| | + | |
| | + | In each of these image files is preserved appropriate information about File and Inode of respective file. Dentry information is effectively stored for regular files only -- the file's ''path''. |
| | | | |
| | == How CRIU gets the information to dump == | | == How CRIU gets the information to dump == |
| Line 84: |
Line 88: |
| | | | |
| | [[Category:Under the hood]] | | [[Category:Under the hood]] |
| | + | [[Category:Files]] |
| | + | [[Category:Editor help needed]] |