Changes

404 bytes added ,  14:58, 25 January 2013
POZOR UWAGA ACHTUNG
Line 1: Line 1: −
<noinclude>This article tries to explain the differences between CRIU and DMTCP
+
<!--
 +
 
 +
WARNING! ACHTUNG! UWAGA! ВНИМАНИЕ! POZOR!
 +
 
 +
When editing this article, remember its contents is also being included into [[Comparison to other CR projects]].
 +
Make sure that one looks OK after you have edited this.
 +
 
 +
If you add something here that should not be included there, wrap it into <noinclude>.
 +
Pay attention to formatting issues such as amount of vertical whitespace. Thanks!
 +
 
 +
-->
 +
<noinclude>This article tries to explain the differences between CRIU and DMTCP.
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>
 
DMTCP implements checkpoint/restore of a process on a library level. This means, that if you want to C/R some application you should launch one with DMTCP library (dynamically) linked from the very beginning. When launched like this, the DMTCP library intercepts a certain amount of library calls from the application, builds a shadow data-base of information about process' internals and then forwards the request down to glibc/kernel. The information gathered is to be used to create an image of the application. With this approach, one can only dump applications known to run successfully with the DMTCP libraries, but the latter doesn't provide proxies for all kernel APIs (for example, inotify() is known to be unsupported). Another implication of this approach is potential performance issues that arise due to proxying of requests.
 
DMTCP implements checkpoint/restore of a process on a library level. This means, that if you want to C/R some application you should launch one with DMTCP library (dynamically) linked from the very beginning. When launched like this, the DMTCP library intercepts a certain amount of library calls from the application, builds a shadow data-base of information about process' internals and then forwards the request down to glibc/kernel. The information gathered is to be used to create an image of the application. With this approach, one can only dump applications known to run successfully with the DMTCP libraries, but the latter doesn't provide proxies for all kernel APIs (for example, inotify() is known to be unsupported). Another implication of this approach is potential performance issues that arise due to proxying of requests.