2,257
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 77:
Line 77: − +
no edit summary
| tests || Run many/all tests in "container" || medium || - || Currently we run zdtm tests one-by-one. It would be nice to run the all in one pseudo-container and C/R them as one big subtree.
| tests || Run many/all tests in "container" || medium || - || Currently we run zdtm tests one-by-one. It would be nice to run the all in one pseudo-container and C/R them as one big subtree.
|-
|-
| tests || Trinity-like (fuzz) testing || hard || - || The existing suite is 99% functionality testing. Need more sophisticated testing -- take a process that has done a random set of actions, C/R one, check that all is OK. The latter is the most complicated thing.
| tests || [[Fuzz testing|Trinity-like (fuzz) testing]] || hard || - || The existing suite is 99% functionality testing. Need more sophisticated testing -- take a process that has done a random set of actions, C/R one, check that all is OK. The latter is the most complicated thing.
|-
|-
| tests/infrastructure || Run tests on patches sent to the mailing lists || medium || Ruslan Kuprieiev || It's quite typical that a set sent to the mailing list fails some tests. Need a robot that would monitor the list, check the patches and send the result back.
| tests/infrastructure || Run tests on patches sent to the mailing lists || medium || Ruslan Kuprieiev || It's quite typical that a set sent to the mailing list fails some tests. Need a robot that would monitor the list, check the patches and send the result back.