Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
924 bytes added ,  09:05, 5 March 2012
no edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:  
       eventually comes to tears and the project as a whole fails, it should                                                               
 
       eventually comes to tears and the project as a whole fails, it should                                                               
 
       be a simple matter to go through and delete all trace of it.
 
       be a simple matter to go through and delete all trace of it.
 +
* Andrew Morton starts to doubt in CRIU [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/384 "link"]
 +
Thus far our (my) approach has been to trickle the c/r support code
 +
into mainline as it is developed.  Under the assumption that the end
 +
result will be acceptable and useful kernel code.
 +
 +
I'm afraid that I'm losing confidence in that approach.  We have this
 +
patchset, we have Stanislav's "IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace
 +
enhancements" (which apparently needs to get more complex to support
 +
LSM context c/r).  I simply *don't know* what additional patchsets are
 +
expected.  And from what you told me it sounds like networking support
 +
is at a very early stage and I fear for what the end result of that
 +
will look like.
 +
 +
So I don't feel that I can continue feeding these things into mainline
 +
until someone can convince me that we won't have a nasty mess (and/or
 +
an unsufficiently useful feature) at the end of the project.

Navigation menu