Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Resort them so that news are on top
Line 1:
Line 1:
− From: Pavel Emelyanov
− Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7 + tools] Checkpoint/restore mostly in the userspace
− Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:45:10 +0400
−* Jonathan Corbet wrote the article at lwn.net [http://lwn.net/Articles/452184/ "Checkpoint/restart (mostly) in user space"]+
+
+
Line 28:
Line 40:
− Thus far our (my) approach has been to trickle the c/r support code+ into mainline as it is developed. Under the assumption that the end+
− result will be acceptable and useful kernel code.+ + I'm afraid that I'm losing confidence in that approach. We have this+ patchset, we have Stanislav's "IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace+ enhancements" (which apparently needs to get more complex to support
− LSM context c/r). I simply *don't know* what additional patchsets are
− expected. And from what you told me it sounds like networking support
− is at a very early stage and I fear for what the end result of that
− will look like.
−
− So I don't feel that I can continue feeding these things into mainline
− until someone can convince me that we won't have a nasty mess (and/or
− an unsufficiently useful feature) at the end of the project.
* Pavel sent POC in LKML.
+* Andrew Morton starts to doubt in CRIU [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/384 "link"]
− Thus far our (my) approach has been to trickle the c/r support code
+ into mainline as it is developed. Under the assumption that the end
+ result will be acceptable and useful kernel code.
+ I'm afraid that I'm losing confidence in that approach. We have this
+ patchset, we have Stanislav's "IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace
+ enhancements" (which apparently needs to get more complex to support
+ LSM context c/r). I simply *don't know* what additional patchsets are
+ expected. And from what you told me it sounds like networking support
+ is at a very early stage and I fear for what the end result of that
+ will look like.
+ So I don't feel that I can continue feeding these things into mainline
+ until someone can convince me that we won't have a nasty mess (and/or
+ an unsufficiently useful feature) at the end of the project.
* Linus merged a first wave of patches, adding his thoughts about this (commit 0994695)
* Linus merged a first wave of patches, adding his thoughts about this (commit 0994695)
+
- checkpoint/restart feature work.
- checkpoint/restart feature work.
eventually comes to tears and the project as a whole fails, it should
eventually comes to tears and the project as a whole fails, it should
be a simple matter to go through and delete all trace of it.
be a simple matter to go through and delete all trace of it.
−* Andrew Morton starts to doubt in CRIU [https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/384 "link"]
+* Jonathan Corbet wrote the article at lwn.net [http://lwn.net/Articles/452184/ "Checkpoint/restart (mostly) in user space"]
−* Pavel sent POC in LKML.
− From: Pavel Emelyanov
− Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7 + tools] Checkpoint/restore mostly in the userspace
− Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:45:10 +0400
−